A Novel Performance‐Based Paradigm of Care for Cochlear Implant Follow‐Up.

Autor: Grisel, Jedidiah, Miller, Sharon, Schafer, Erin C.
Zdroj: Laryngoscope; Jan2022 Supplement S1, Vol. 132, pS1-S10, 10p
Abstrakt: Objectives: Utilize a multi‐institutional outcomes database to determine expected performance for adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Estimate the percentage of patients who are high performers and achieve performance plateau. Study Design: Retrospective database study. Methods: Outcomes from 9,448 implantations were mined to identify 804 adult, unilateral recipients who had one preoperative and at least one postoperative consonant‐nucleus‐consonant (CNC) word score. Results were examined to determine percent‐correct CNC word recognition preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after activation. Outcomes from 318 similar patients who also had at least three postoperative CNC word scores were examined. Linear mixed‐effects regression was used to examine CNC word performance over time. The time when each patient achieved maximum performance was recorded as a surrogate for time of performance plateau. Patients were assigned as candidates for less intense follow‐up if they were high performers and achieved performance plateau. Results: Among 804 patients with at least one postoperative score, CNC score improved at all time intervals. Average performance after the 3‐month time interval was 47.2% to 51.5%, indicating a CNC ≥ 50% cutoff for high performers. Among 318 patients with at least three postoperative scores, performance improved from 1 to 3 (P =.001), 3 to 6 (P =.001), and 6 to 12 (P =.01) months. Scores from the 12‐ and 24‐month intervals did not significantly differ (P =.09). By 12 months after activation, 59.7% of patients were considered candidates for less intense follow‐up. Conclusion: Findings suggest that CNC ≥ 50% is a reasonable cutoff to separate high performers from low performers. Within 12 months after activation, 59.7% of patients were good candidates for less intense follow‐up. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:S1–S10, 2022 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index