| Autor: |
Garces, Jerome Ignatius T., Tan, Raymond R., Beltran, Arnel B., Ongpeng, Jason Maximino C., Promentilla, Michael Angelo B. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
CET Journal - Chemical Engineering Transactions; 11/15/2021, Vol. 88, p835-840, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Alternative low-carbon cementitious binders such as geopolymers are rapidly garnering scientific interest to replace Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). Industrial waste by-products such as coal fly ash (CFA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) are usually utilized for this material. Microcapsules can also be added to geopolymers to enhance its self-healing capability as it has potential environmental benefits aside from cost savings. This study thus focuses on the cradle-to-gate LCA of geopolymer concrete containing microcapsules for self-healing. Two different microcapsules were considered: Urea-formaldehyde (UF)/Dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) and Poly(urea-urethane) (PUU)/Alkali-activator (AA). Three different geopolymer precursors were studied: CFA, GGBS and CFA/GGBS. OpenLCA software was used for the calculations and analysis, and the inventory data were obtained from Ecoinvent and OzLCI2019 supplemented by literature data. An impact assessment was carried out using CML 2001. Self-healing geopolymer concrete is better in terms of lower global warming potential but performs worse in other impact categories than conventional OPC concrete. Of the geopolymer concrete assessed, GGBS concrete has the lowest impacts. On the other hand, of the two selfhealing microcapsules, UF/DCPD is better for the environment. The primary factor for this difference is the solvent used in microcapsule synthesis. From this result, it has been shown that self-healing GGBS concrete containing UF/DCPD microcapsules has the lowest impacts of the self-healing concrete assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
