| Autor: |
Felipe Soares, Pedro, Calchi Fanti Fernandes, Maria Tereza, de Santana Souza, Andréia, Medina Lopes, Caio, Carvalho dos Santos, Darjore Amorim, Rodrigues Oliveira, Diogo Pereira, Gottschald Pereira, Marcela, De Brito Lima Prado, Nilia Maria, da Silva Gomes, Gecynalda Soares, Santos Junior, Genário, Paraná, Raymundo |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Annals of Hepatology: Official Journal of the Mexican Association of Hepatology; Nov/Dec2021, Vol. 25, p1-8, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
Algorithms can have several purposes in the clinical practice. There are different scales for causality imputation in DILI (Drug-Induced Liver Injury), but the applicability and validity of these for the HILI (Herb-Induced Liver Injury) evaluation is questionable for some scales. The purpose of the study was to determine the clinical and demographic profile of the patients with HILI, and the main algorithmic scales used in its causality assessment. The methodology was a systematic review of articles in English, Spanish, or Portuguese language, from 1979 to 2019, involving humans, with descriptors related to HILI. Qualitative and quantitative statistical analysis were performed. As a result, from a total of 60 articles, 203 HILI reports were selected: 59.9% were women, similar with other studies, and the average age was 45.8 years. Jaundice was the most frequent symptom and regarding the type of lesion, the hepatocellular was the most frequent. In regard to HILI severity, 3.0% were severe and 7.6% were fatal or required liver transplantation. In 72.3% of the cases, the most used algorithm was RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method). The conclusion of the study is that RUCAM was the most used algorithm for causality assessment in HILI. The patients were predominantly female, jaundice was the main symptom, and HILI is reversible in the majority of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
