| Autor: |
Dell'Era, Gabriele, Prenna, Eleonora, Ziacchi, Matteo, Diemberger, Igor, Varalda, Marco, Guerra, Federico, Biffi, Mauro, Occhetta, Eraldo, Patti, Giuseppe |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology; Nov2021, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p1884-1889, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Aims and methods: In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)‐related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti‐bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual‐coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high‐volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand‐by for a mean of 16.5 (4–30) days before the reimplant. Results: No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p =.004). Post‐procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti‐tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks. Conclusions: An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
