| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: Fractures ofthe clavicle are frequent injuries (between 4 and 10% of adult fractures) and mid-shaft diaphyseal fractures represent more than 80% of clavicle fractures. In a recent study from the USA in 2019, an incidence of 22.4 fractures per year per 100,000 people was reported. Multiple injury mechanisms are recognised, with sport accounting for 50 to 85% of these injuries. There is little or no consensus as to the optimal treatment but in recent years multiple studies have suggested operative management should be favoured in athletes and young active patients.Objectives: These are (1) to present the anatomy and the anatomical-pathology of the fractures of the clavicle as well as the mechanisms of injury, (2), (3) to describe non-operative and operative treatment methods, (4) to review the literature around different treatment modalities and (5) to attempt to describe the best treatment for athletes.Methods: To collect and analyse the most recent articles of the literature regarding the management of displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle for athletes and young active people.Results: Looking at studies of the general population, the results tend to favour surgical treatment with a smaller incidence of non-union and faster return to function. These results are mirrored in the athlete population where several studies have shown excellent anatomic restoration and functional recovery after plate fixation.Conclusion: Based on this analysis, with the exception of patients who refuse operative management after an informed discussion, the treatment of choice in displaced clavicle fractures in athletes seems to be operative treatment with a plate and screws. However, prospective randomised studies comparing non-surgical treatment and plate osteosynthesis are missing and it is not possible to state that the latter is the best treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink