| Autor: |
Cheung, MC, Hopcraft, MS, Darby, IB |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Australian Dental Journal; Sep2021, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p278-288, 11p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: This study investigated the preferences of dentists in Australia in providing professional implant maintenance and implant‐specific oral hygiene instructions (OHI). Methods: General dentists were surveyed online about their preferences in peri‐implant diagnostics, maintenance provision, armamentarium used, and implant OHI techniques and frequency. Results: Most of the 303 respondents (96%) provided maintenance services; 87.6% reviewed implants regularly while 10.7% only performed diagnostics after detecting clinical signs/symptoms. Supragingival prosthesis cleaning was performed by 77.9% of respondents, 35.0% performed subgingival debridement, 41.9% treated peri‐implant mucositis and 18.2% treated peri‐implantitis. About 15% did not treat nor refer peri‐implant disease, including significantly more non‐implant providers and dentists without implant training. Maintenance armamentarium commonly included floss (76.3%), prophylaxis (73.9%), plastic curettes (43.3%) and stainless‐steel ultrasonics (38.0%). Brushing (86.5%), flossing (73.9%) and interdental brush use (68.3%) were most commonly recommended. Implant OHI was repeated routinely by 57.4% of dentists who provided it. Dentists with greater implant training and experience were more likely to perform reviews and complex maintenance procedures. Conclusions: Peri‐implant diagnostics performed, treatments provided and armamentarium varied among dentists. Implant providers and those with higher levels of training had more preventative approaches to implant OHI. Possible shortcomings in disease management and OHI reinforcement were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text