| Autor: |
Reich, Daniel, Evans, Subhadra, Nelson, Barnaby, Hickey, Tara, O'Shea, Melissa |
| Zdroj: |
Mindfulness; Aug2021, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p1860-1877, 18p |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives: How to best implement mindfulness interventions within different stages of psychosis (high risk for psychosis, first episode psychosis (FEP), established psychosis) remains relatively unexplored. Understanding where and how mindfulness research has been conducted at different stages of illness can guide future research, and improve intervention acceptability and treatment effects. Methods: An evidence mapping approach was taken to systematically search and identify where and how mindfulness research has been conducted across stages of psychosis. Papers were examined for intervention approaches and safety concerns, and content analysis examined practitioner recommendations to identify recommendations within and across stages of illness. Results: A paucity of research relating to the application of mindfulness in the treatment of psychotic illness exists for the high risk stage, with some research in FEP. The majority of research examines mindfulness approaches for the chronic stage of illness. Intervention formats for different stages of psychosis varied widely. Across all stages of psychosis, authors recommended adaptations for cognitive impairments (e.g., shorter exercises for impacted attention), longer interventions, and more helpful ways of explaining mindfulness and encouraging practice. Few stage-specific recommendations emerged beyond the potential helpfulness of compassion-based practices within earlier stages of illness where self-stigmatization often emerges. Conclusions: Recommendations for how to best adapt mindfulness to early intervention in psychosis are needed, and future research needs to better understand risks and utility of different mindfulness practices for different stages of illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink