Frame-based versus frameless stereotactic brain biopsies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor: Kesserwan, Mohamad Ali, Shakil, Husain, Lannon, Melissa, McGinn, Ryan, Banfield, Laura, Nath, Siddharth, Alotaibi, Mazen, Kasper, Ekkehard, Sharma, Sunjay
Předmět:
Zdroj: Surgical Neurology International; 2/10/2021, Vol. 12, p1-8, 8p
Abstrakt: Background: Stereotactic brain biopsy techniques have been a focus of rapid technological innovation. The recent advent of frameless stereotaxy has invited the question of whether it can provide the same diagnostic yield as frame-based techniques, without increasing risk of harm to patients. The goal of this meta-analysis was to compare each of these techniques in terms of yield and safety. Methods: We independently searched four databases for English studies comparing frameless and framebased stereotactic brain biopsies. Our primary outcome was biopsy diagnostic yield. Our secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity (e.g., symptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, asymptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, new postbiopsy neurological deficit, and postbiopsy seizure), and frequency of repeat biopsy. We calculated pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes using Review Manager 5.3, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Methods: We independently searched four databases for English studies comparing frameless and framebased stereotactic brain biopsies. Our primary outcome was biopsy diagnostic yield. Our secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity (e.g., symptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, asymptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, new postbiopsy neurological deficit, and postbiopsy seizure), and frequency of repeat biopsy. We calculated pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes using Review Manager 5.3, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Methods: We independently searched four databases for English studies comparing frameless and framebased stereotactic brain biopsies. Our primary outcome was biopsy diagnostic yield. Our secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity (e.g., symptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, asymptomatic postbiopsy intracranial hemorrhage, new postbiopsy neurological deficit, and postbiopsy seizure), and frequency of repeat biopsy. We calculated pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes using Review Manager 5.3, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index