| Autor: |
Kekecs, Zoltan, Roberts, Lynae, Na, Hyeji, Yek, Ming Hwei, Slonena, Elizabeth E., Racelis, Ezrhiel, Voor, Tamara A., Johansson, Robert, Rizzo, Pietro, Csikos, Endre, Vizkievicz, Vanda, Elkins, Gary |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis; Jan-Mar2021, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p142-161, 20p |
| Abstrakt: |
This project aimed to assess the consistency of hypnotizability over repeated assessments when measured by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C), and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) and to contrast score distribution and pleasantness of these scales. University students were administered either the SHSS:C or the EHS twice with a one-week delay by separate experimenters. Test–retest reliability of the EHS and the SHSS:C was rs =.82 (.71-.92) and rs =.66, 95% (.47-.86), respectively (Spearman's correlation). Hypnotizability was comparable at test and retest in the EHS group, SHSS:C scores decreased by the retest. We found that the SHSS:C produced higher scores than the EHS, and the pleasantness of the 2 scales was comparable. Overall, our results supported the reliability of the EHS, while SHSS:C scores were more inconsistent between the 2 assessments. More research is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
