| Autor: |
N. C., Rashmi, A., Anupama, Singh, Nikita, Kukreja, Navneet, Gupta, Deepak, Sharma, Ankita |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development; Feb2020, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p283-288, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Context: The aim of this study is to compare the one year clinical performance of three bulk fill restorative materials in posterior class I occlusal restorations. 20 patients received three class I with one of three bulkfill restorative resins. Sonicfill, Tetric Evoceram and Filtek bulkfill. All restorations were evaluated at baseline, at three, six, nine months, and one year after placement. Two calibrated examiners other than the operator were evaluated each restoration. Modified USPHS criteria was used to evaluate the restorations. The results were statistically insignificant. More studies need to be carried out and for a long period of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
