| Autor: |
Lasisi, Ahmed A., Akinremi, Olalekan O., Zhang, Qiang, Kumaragamage, Darshani |
| Zdroj: |
Soil Science Society of America Journal; May/Jun2020, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p949-962, 14p |
| Abstrakt: |
Mid‐ or late‐fall N fertilization is usually recommended on the Canadian prairies to reduce N losses from fall‐applied N. Yet, N fertilizers are less efficient when applied in mid‐ or late fall than in spring on crop yield. Ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers is one of the reasons for the low N use efficiency. We conducted a 2‐yr study to quantify and contrast the efficacy of a urease inhibitor, N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), with and without a nitrification inhibitor, 3,4‐ dimethylpyrazole phosphate (NI), in reducing NH3 volatilization from fall‐ and spring‐applied urea‐based fertilizers in two contrasting soils. Treatments consisted of surface‐applied urea and urea–NH4NO3 (UAN) with and without NBPT or NBPT + NI (double inhibitor, DI). We measured NH3 volatilization with acid‐charged disks during 21 (fall) or 28 (spring) d. Total NH3 volatilization (percentage of applied N) from untreated urea and UAN across sites ranged from 7 to 22% with fall application and from 3 to 29% with spring application. Addition of NBPT only or DI to urea or UAN reduced NH3 volatilization by 61 to 74% in the fall and 4 to 69% in the spring across site‐years. We found that the reduction of NH3 volatilization by NBPT was significantly greater in the fall (65%) than in the spring (40%) and with urea (61%) than with UAN (43%). Our study showed that (a) significant NH3 volatilization could occur from surface‐applied urea‐based fertilizers even under late‐fall temperatures and (b) NBPT reduced NH3 volatilization from fall‐ as well as spring‐applied urea‐based fertilizers. Therefore, farmers are encouraged to treat their urea‐based fertilizers with NBPT when considering surface application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text