Outbreak of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Interventional Radiology: Detection Through Whole-genome Sequencing-based Surveillance.

Autor:	Sundermann, Alexander J, Babiker, Ahmed, Marsh, Jane W, Shutt, Kathleen A, Mustapha, Mustapha M, Pasculle, Anthony W, Ezeonwuka, Chinelo, Saul, Melissa I, Pacey, Marissa P, Tyne, Daria Van, Ayres, Ashley M, Cooper, Vaughn S, Snyder, Graham M, Harrison, Lee H
Předmět:	CROSS infection prevention PREVENTION of infectious disease transmission PREVENTION of communicable diseases CONFIDENCE intervals ENTEROCOCCUS DISEASE outbreaks MEDICAL records PUBLIC health surveillance INTERVENTIONAL radiology STERILIZATION (Disinfection) ENTEROCOCCAL infections VANCOMYCIN resistance CONTRAST media CASE-control method DESCRIPTIVE statistics SEQUENCE analysis ACQUISITION of data methodology ODDS ratio INFECTIOUS disease transmission
Zdroj:	Clinical Infectious Diseases; Jun2020, Vol. 70 Issue 11, p2336-2343, 8p
Abstrakt:	Background Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a major cause of hospital-acquired infections. The risk of infection from interventional radiology (IR) procedures is not well documented. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance of clinical bacterial isolates among hospitalized patients can identify previously unrecognized outbreaks. Methods We analyzed WGS surveillance data from November 2016 to November 2017 for evidence of VRE transmission. A previously unrecognized cluster of 10 genetically related VRE (Enterococcus faecium) infections was discovered. Electronic health record review identified IR procedures as a potential source. An outbreak investigation was conducted. Results Of the 10 outbreak patients, 9 had undergone an IR procedure with intravenous (IV) contrast ≤22 days before infection. In a matched case-control study, preceding IR procedure and IR procedure with contrast were associated with VRE infection (matched odds ratio [MOR], 16.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01 to 138.73; P =.009 and MOR, 39.35; 95% CI, 7.85 to infinity; P <.001, respectively). Investigation of IR practices and review of the manufacturer's training video revealed sterility breaches in contrast preparation. Our investigation also supported possible transmission from an IR technician. Infection prevention interventions were implemented, and no further IR-associated VRE transmissions have been observed. Conclusions A prolonged outbreak of VRE infections related to IR procedures with IV contrast resulted from nonsterile preparation of injectable contrast. The fact that our VRE outbreak was discovered through WGS surveillance and the manufacturer's training video that demonstrated nonsterile technique raise the possibility that infections following invasive IR procedures may be more common than previously recognized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu