How Would Low-Income Communities Prioritize Medicaid Spending?
| Autor: | Myers, C. Daniel, Kieffer, Edith C., Fendrick, A. Mark, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Calhoun, Karen, Szymecko, Lisa, LaHahnn, Lynnette, Ledón, Charo, Danis, Marion, Rowe, Zachary, Dorr Goold, Susan |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
DENTAL economics
CHRONIC diseases COMMUNITIES HEALTH care rationing INSURANCE MATHEMATICAL models MEDICAID MEDICAL care use MEDICAL emergencies HEALTH policy MEDICAL specialties & specialists POLICY sciences POVERTY PRIMARY health care SURVEYS INFORMATION resources PATIENT participation HEALTH insurance reimbursement THEORY GROUP process DATA analysis software DESCRIPTIVE statistics |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law; Jun2020, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p373-418, 46p, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts, 2 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: | Context: Medicaid plays a critical role in low-income, minority, and medically underserved communities, particularly in states that have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Yet, the voices of underresourced communities are often unheard in decisions about how to allocate Medicaid's scarce resources, and traditional methods of public engagement are poorly suited to gathering such input. We argue that deliberative public engagement can be a useful tool for involving communities in setting Medicaid priorities. Method: We engaged 209 residents of low-income, medically underserved Michigan communities in discussions about Medicaid spending priorities using an exercise in informed deliberation: CHAT (CHoosing All Together). Participants learned about Medicaid, deliberated in small groups, and set priorities both individually and collectively. Findings: Participants prioritized broad eligibility consistent with the ACA expansion, accepted some cost sharing, and prioritized spending in areas--including mental health--that are historically underfunded. Participants allocated less funding beyond benefit coverage, such as spending on healthy communities. Participants perceived the deliberative process as fair and informative, and they supported using it in the policy-making process. Conclusion: The choices of participants from low-income, medically underserved communities reflect a unique set of priorities and suggest that engaging low-income communities more deeply in Medicaid policy making might result in different prioritization decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|