| Autor: |
Jones, Barbara L. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases; Mar2019, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p8-10, 3p |
| Abstrakt: |
The petitioner appealed a denial of supplemental-social-income benefits through the administrative process. Furthermore, the statute confirms that judicial review is available because it specifies that judicial review will be narrow and limited to the question of conformity with agency regulations, the Solicitor General states. According to amicus, the petitioner and the Solicitor General are wrong to claim that judicial review is not barred by lack of a hearing if the SSA has determined that a hearing is not necessary. [Extracted from the article] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
