| Autor: |
Bindzárová Gergeľová, Marcela, Kuzevičová, Žofia, Labant, Slavomír, Gašinec, Juraj, Kuzevič, Štefan, Unucka, Jan, Liptai, Pavol |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Applied Sciences (2076-3417); Feb2020, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p820, 21p |
| Abstrakt: |
Featured Application: The results of the study can be applied in the part of the public administration of the Slovak Republic, especially for the Slovak Water Management Company in cooperation with municipalities in the processing of flood hazard maps and flood risk maps. The study also provides recommendations for the development of the concept of spatial data collection in the territory of the Slovak Republic according to the INSPIRE Directive. Weather-related disasters represent a major threat to the sustainable development of society. This study focuses directly on the assessment of the state of spatial information quality for the needs of hydrodynamic modeling. Based on the selected procedures and methods designed for the collection and processing of spatial information, the aim of this study was to assess their qualitative level of suitability for 3D flood event modeling in accordance with the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) Directive. In the evaluation process we entered geodetic measurements and the digital relief model 3.5 (DMR 3.5) available for the territory of the Slovak Republic. The result of this study is an assessment of the qualitative analysis on three levels: (i) main channel and surrounding topography data from geodetic measurements; (ii) digital relief model; and (iii) hydrodynamic/hydraulic modeling. The qualitative aspect of the input data shows the sensitivity of a given model to changes in the input data quality condition. The average spatial error in the determination of a point's position was calculated as 0.017 m of all measured points along a watercourse and its slope foot and slope edge. Although the declared accuracy of DMR 3.5 is assumed to be ±2.50 m, in some of the sections in the selected area there were differences in elevation up to 4.79 m. For this reason, we needed a combination of DMR 3.5 and geodetic measurements to refine the input model for the process of hydrodynamic modeling. The quality of the hydrological data for the monitored N annual flow levels was of fourth-class reliability for the selected area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
