| Autor: |
Richard Colmant, Gaëlle, Kodjikian, Laurent, De Parisot De Bernecourt, Audrey, Guillaud, Martin, Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu, Denis, Philippe, Broussolle, Christiane, Jamilloux, Yvan, Sève, Pascal |
| Zdroj: |
Ocular Immunology & Inflammation; 2019, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p1251-1258, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: Despite the huge advance in diagnostic technics, about one-third of uveitis is still considered of unknown etiology. In this study, we aimed to report their clinical features and to describe how a diagnosis has been finally reached for some patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2002 and 2016. The unknown etiology was admitted after a new ophthalmologic examination and a full work-up in internal medicine in our tertiary center.Results: Among 957 patients with uveitis, 355 had uveitis of unknown etiology. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of this subgroup were no different from those with a known etiology. Out of 104 patients who were followed-up for more than 1 year, a diagnosis was finally achieved in 20 patients. The diagnosis was determined either because of the occurrence of a new clinical symptom (n = 10), a new/repeated non-ophthalmologic investigation (n = 7), or a new/repeated ophthalmic exam (n = 3).Conclusion: A prolonged follow-up, with repeated exams, may allow the determination of an etiology in about one-fifth of uveitis initially considered as idiopathic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|
