Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.

Autor: Lilian Soares Couto, Ruffo Freitas-Junior, Rosangela Silveira Correa, João Emílio Peixoto, Claudio Domingues Almeida, Danielle Cristina Netto Rodrigues, Leonard M Glassman, Leonardo Ribeiro Soares
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Radiological Protection; Jun2019, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p1-1, 1p
Abstrakt: Purpose: Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) is the quantity related to the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the MGD in screening mammography for women with breast implants. Methods: This retrospective study used data of 2680 mammographies of 335 asymptomatic women with mammary implants examined in a digital direct x-ray unit. Each woman had a total of eight images: four in standard views and four with posterior displacement of the implant (ID). Data on kV, mAs, target/filter combination, compressed breast thickness and MGD were obtained from the DICOM header of the stored images. Quantitative variables were presented through descriptive statistics for median (5th–95th percentiles); and the qualitative variables were presented by numbers and percentages. Mean glandular doses of standard views and ID views were compared and statistical analysis was used to assess the influence of implant position, breast glandularity and thickness on mean glandular doses. Results: Median MGD for standard views were 3.30 (2.60–4.00) mGy for CC and 3.31 (2.70–4.20) mGy for MLO. For ID views, median were 1.20 (0.90–2.20) mGy and 1.40 (0.97–3.74) mGy for CC and MLO views, respectively. Median MGD for the whole examination of women with breast implants was 9.60 (7.92–12.07) mGy, ranging from 6.25 to 21.50 mGy. When comparing MGD median for standard and ID views it was found a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), with higher doses for the standard views due to the greater compressed breast thickness in these views. It was observed that, in the standard views, MGD decreases with increasing breast thickness due to the manual radiographic techniques used to expose the women. It was also observed that implant position does not affect MGD in breast augmentation mammography. Conclusion: Mammography of women with mammary implants gives higher radiation doses when compared with those without implants. For more accurate dose assessment in augmented breast mammography, it is necessary that specific conversion factors for the calculation of MGD based on air kerma at entrance of breasts with implants are made available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index