Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Analysis of Complications From a Systematic Review.

Autor: Scerrino, Gregorio, Melfa, Giuseppina, Raspanti, Cristina, Rotolo, Giulia, Salamone, Giuseppe, Licari, Leo, Fontana, Tommaso, Tutino, Roberta, Porrello, Calogero, Gulotta, Gaspare, Cocorullo, Gianfranco
Zdroj: Surgical Innovation; Jun2019, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p381-387, 7p
Abstrakt: Background: Nowadays, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is considered a safe and effective option. However, its complication rate has not been specifically discussed yet. The aim of this systematic review was enrolling a large number of studies to estimate early and late complications (transient and definitive, uni- and bilateral laryngeal nerve palsy; transient and definitive hypocalcemia; cervical hematoma; hypertrophic or keloid scar) of MIVAT compared with conventional technique.Methods: The review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria in PubMed and Embase. Search terms were "minimally invasive," "video-assisted," and "thyroidectomy." We enrolled randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized trials, and noncontrolled trials.Results: Thirty-two articles were considered suitable. Complication rate of MIVAT was quite similar to conventional technique: only one randomized trial found a significant difference concerning overall skin complication, and a single trial highlighted hypocalcemia significantly increased in MIVAT, concerning serologic value only. No difference concerning symptomatic nor definitive hypocalcemia was found.Conclusions: We can confirm that MIVAT is a safe technique. It should be adopted in mean-high-volume surgery centers for thyroidectomy, if a strict compliance with indication was applied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index