NON-PHYSICIAN VS. PHYSICIAN: CROSSDISCIPLINARY EXPERT TESTIMONY IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION--WHO KNOWS THE STANDARD OF CARE?

Autor:	Ginsberg, Marc D.
Předmět:	COURTS MEDICAL malpractice MEDICAL quality control PHYSICIANS EXPERT evidence MEDICAL laws
Zdroj:	Georgia State University Law Review; Spring2019, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p679-725, 47p
Abstrakt:	The article focuses on how courts understand medicine, the standard of care, and the professional, experiential distinction between physicians and non-physicians in the U.S. Topics include propriety of cross-disciplinary expert testimony in medical negligence case; enactment of Medical Liability Act of Alabama for addressing medical malpractice; and the Supreme Court of Oregon court case Trees v. Ordonez on the same.
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu