| Abstrakt: |
Introduction. The aim of this recearch is to identify the main disproportions of the development management of the national innovation system. Materials and methods. The materials of the research contain the analysis of development state of the Ukrainian innovation system. The national innovation system is considered in the context of compliance with the international measurements and the concept of transition to the formation of knowledge society. It have been used the method of comparison, system analysis as well as survey. A logical-abstract method was used to group national and international analytical results. Result and discussion. It is proved, that the main restrictive factor while forming of comprehensive whole and developing of its breakthroughs is inconsistent, and sometimes destructive management, insufficient activity of public administration and residual financing of needs. In the state administration and research environment of Ukraine there are somewhat opposite ideas about the state and needs of further innovation development. Public officials consider it necessary to put science at the service of the immediate business needs in order to strengthen the country's position on the international market and increase overall competitiveness. This, in turn, serves the purpose of implementing the tasks entrusted to the government by international financial donors. For its part, the scientific environment defends the long-term goals of preserving the country's scientific, technological and innovative potential. Support for fundamental research does not bring a quick result, but it preserves opportunities for development for future generations. In view of this, it is critical to address the call of functionaries to reformat the directions of the market to meet market demand and the current needs of the real sector of the economy. The discrepancy in approaches to scientific innovations and the directions of their implementation is reflected in the scope of state financial and organizational support. To fund the innovation development fund in 2018, only $ 2 million has been allocated. The second issue of the country's innovation development is the lack of development of national legislation, especially in modern areas, such as the creation of innovative ecosystems. In general, this can be diagnosed as a consequence of an institutional destructive policy at the state level. The scientific activity is not included into the list of state priorities: there is a constant reduction of funding both for institutions and scientific research. Conclusions. Forming of an effective and competitive national innovation system requires the legislative and tool consolidation of innovative development of the country, creation and structuring of the innovation market under national control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
