Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module i: Level of Personality Functioning Scale.

Autor: Buer Christensen, Tore, Paap, Muirne C. S., Arnesen, Marianne, Koritzinsky, Karoline, Nysaeter, Tor-Erik, Eikenaes, Ingeborg, Germans Selvik, Sara, Walther, Kristoffer, Torgersen, Svenn, Bender, Donna S., Skodol, Andrew E., Kvarstein, Elfrida, Pedersen, Geir, Hummelen, Benjamin
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Personality Assessment; Nov-Dec2018, Vol. 100 Issue 6, p630-641, 12p, 2 Charts, 1 Graph
Abstrakt: The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from.77 to.94 for subdomains,.89 to.95 for domains, and.96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from.24 to.72 for subdomains,.59 to.90 for domains, and.75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje