| Autor: |
Madžar, Dominik, Reindl, Caroline, Giede-Jeppe, Antje, Bobinger, Tobias, Sprügel, Maximilian I., Knappe, Ruben U., Hamer, Hajo M., Huttner, Hagen B. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Critical Care; 11/21/2018, Vol. 22 Issue 1, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Patients in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) may require treatment with continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (cIVADs) for seizure control. The use of cIVADs, however, was recently associated with poor outcome in status epilepticus (SE), raising the question of whether cIVAD therapy should be delayed for attempts to halt seizures with repeated non-anesthetic antiepileptic drugs. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of differences in therapeutic approaches on RSE outcome using timing of cIVAD therapy as a surrogate for treatment aggressiveness.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study over 14 years (n = 77) comparing patients with RSE treated with cIVADs within and after 48 h after RSE onset, and functional status at last follow-up was the primary outcome (good = return to premorbid baseline or modified Rankin Scale score of less than 3). Secondary outcomes included discharge functional status, in-hospital mortality, RSE termination, induction of burst suppression, use of thiopental, duration of RSE after initiation of cIVADs, duration of mechanical ventilation, and occurrence of super-refractory SE. Analysis was performed on the total cohort and on subgroups defined by RSE severity according to the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and by the variables contained therein.Results: Fifty-three (68.8%) patients received cIVADs within the first 48 h. Early cIVAD treatment was independently associated with good outcome (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.175, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.273-7.918; P = 0.013) as well as lower chance of both induction of burst suppression (aRR 0.661, 95% CI 0.507-0.861; P = 0.002) and use of thiopental (aRR 0.446, 95% CI 0.205-0.874; P = 0.043). RSE duration after cIVAD initiation was shorter in the early cIVAD cohort (hazard ratio 1.796, 95% CI 1.047-3.081; P = 0.033). Timing of cIVAD use did not impact the remaining secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed early cIVAD impact on the primary outcome to be driven by patients with STESS of less than 3.Conclusions: Patients with RSE treated with cIVADs may benefit from early initiation of such therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink