A comparison of the reported use of involuntary treatment orders within Australian jurisdictions.

Autor: Clugston, Bobbie, Young, Amy, Heffernan, Edward B.
Předmět:
Zdroj: Australasian Psychiatry; Oct2018, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p482-485, 4p
Abstrakt: Objective: This paper identifies publicly available data about the use of involuntary treatment orders within Australia and considers whether this reporting is sufficient given the gravity of the intervention.Method: A search of mental health tribunal, health department and justice department annual reports was conducted to determine the use of involuntary treatment orders in Australia.Results: Reporting of involuntary treatment orders varied significantly across jurisdictions; for example, South Australia reported 11,570 distinct orders made during a 12-month period while the Australian Capital Territory reported 627 for the same period.Conclusion: The publicly available data for involuntary treatment orders in Australia is inadequate for jurisdictional comparisons. This concern should be addressed to enable transparent public reporting and facilitate benchmarking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index