| Autor: |
Caliento, Rubens, Sarmento, Dmitry José de Santana, Kobayashi‐Velasco, Solange, de Sá, Stella Núbia Coelho, Shibutani, Patrícia Pinheiro, Gallotini, Marina, Kobayashi-Velasco, Solange |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Special Care in Dentistry; May/Jun2018, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p146-149, 4p |
| Abstrakt: |
Aims: To compare outcomes of dental procedures among a group of renal transplant recipients who had received antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) before the procedure and another group that had not received AP.Methods and Results: The records of all renal transplant patients treated at the Special Care Dentistry Center (SCDC) were assessed. Dental procedures documented in the records were classified as invasive or noninvasive. All dental procedures performed were compiled, and the prescription or nonprescription of prophylactic antibiotics, and the incidence and description of postoperative complications after invasive procedures were recorded. Eighty-seven records were evaluated. Out of 190 invasive procedures all were simple dental extractions, 107 (56.3%) were preceded by AP; out of 242 noninvasive procedures, 14 (5.7%) were preceded by AP. A lack of uniformity on the type and dose of the antibiotic prescribed was observed. Four postoperative complications after invasive procedures (dental extraction) were noted and in 2 cases the procedures were preceded by AP.Conclusion: This retrospective study showed no difference in postextraction outcomes between renal transplant recipients who received and who did not receive AP before dental extractions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text