Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway.

Autor: Sánchez-García, Miguel, Santos, Passio, Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema, Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando, Fariña-González, Tomás, del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela, Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos, Busto-González, Beatriz, Requesens-Solera, Mónica, Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes, Romero-Romero, Francisco, Núñez-Reiz, Antonio
Předmět:
Zdroj: Intensive Care Medicine Experimental; 4/3/2018, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1-1, 1p
Abstrakt: Background: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance.Methods: We applied insufflation of 50 cmH2O for 3 s and exsufflation of − 45 cmH2O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death.Results: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated.Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations.Trial registration: EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje