Impact of Cleaning Procedures on Adhesion of Living Cells to Three Abutment Materials.
| Autor: | Mehl, Christian, Kern, Matthias, Zimmermann, Anna, Harder, Sönke, Huth, Steven, Selhuber-Unkel, Christine |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
CLEANING
FIBROBLAST adhesion DENTAL abutments GINGIVA DENTAL material testing STEAM LITHIUM ZIRCONIUM oxide PHYSIOLOGY CELL adhesion molecules ULTRASONIC imaging DENTAL metallurgy ANALYSIS of variance COLLECTION & preservation of biological specimens DENTAL materials DENTIN GUMS & resins MASS spectrometry TITANIUM DATA analysis software ANATOMY |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants; 2017, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p976-984, 9p, 1 Color Photograph, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 3 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: To test the adhesion properties of live gingival fibroblasts to three different implant abutment materials after five different cleaning procedures. Materials and Methods: Highly polished discs of lithium disilicate (LS), zirconium dioxide (Zr), and titanium alloy (Ti) were fabricated. The specimens were cleaned by one of five different methods: steam (S), argon plasma (AP), ultrasound and disinfection (UD), ultrasound and sterilization in an autoclave (UA), or photofunctionalization with high-intensity ultraviolet light (PF). Cell detachment force (adhesion) was measured by single-cell force spectroscopy, which is a method to quantify cell adhesion at the single cell level. Data were statistically analyzed using parametric tests (analysis of variance [ANOVA], t tests). Results: Cell detachment forces in the low nN regime were recorded in all experiments. Significant differences in cell adhesion on the different materials were found as a function of the cleaning method (P ≤ .0001). For LS abutments, no significant differences between the cleaning methods could be found (P > .05). For Zr specimens, the AP method showed the highest cell detachment forces, followed by UD, PF, S, and UA (S/UD, S/UA, S/PF, AP/UD, and UD/PF were not significantly different from each other). For Ti abutments, UD showed the highest cell detachment forces, followed by S, AP, and UA/PF (S/UD, S/UA, S/PF, AP/U, and UA/PF were not significantly different from each other). Conclusion: All cleaning methods provided comparable cell detachment forces for LS abutments. AP/PF or ultrasonic cleaning were the most suitable methods for strong cell adhesion on Zr. UD provided the best cell adhesion for Ti. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|