School-based cognitive behavioral interventions for anxious youth: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Autor: Haugland, Bente Storm Mowatt, Raknes, Solfrid, Haaland, Aashild Tellefsen, Wergeland, Gro Janne, Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger, Baste, Valborg, Himle, Joe, Rapee, Ron, Hoffart, Asle
Předmět:
Zdroj: Trials; 3/4/2017, Vol. 18, p1-11, 11p, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts
Abstrakt: Background: Anxiety disorders are prevalent among adolescents and may have long-lasting negative consequences for the individual, the family and society. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment. However, many anxious youth do not seek treatment. Low-intensity CBT in schools may improve access to evidence-based services. We aim to investigate the efficacy of two CBT youth anxiety programs with different intensities (i.e., number and length of sessions), both group-based and administered as early interventions in a school setting. The objectives of the study are to examine the effects of school-based interventions for youth anxiety and to determine whether a less intensive intervention is non-inferior to a more intensive intervention.Methods/design: The present study is a randomized controlled trial comparing two CBT interventions to a waitlist control group. A total of 18 schools participate and we aim to recruit 323 adolescents (12-16 years). Youth who score above a cutoff on an anxiety symptom scale will be included in the study. School nurses recruit participants and deliver the interventions, with mental health workers as co-therapists and/or supervisors. Primary outcomes are level of anxiety symptoms and anxiety-related functional impairments. Secondary outcomes are level of depressive symptoms, quality of life and general psychosocial functioning. Non-inferiority between the two active interventions will be declared if a difference of 1.4 or less is found on the anxiety symptom measure post-intervention and a difference of 0.8 on the interference scale. Effects will be analyzed by mixed effect models, applying an intention to treat procedure.Discussion: The present study extends previous research by comparing two programs with different intensity. A brief intervention, if effective, could more easily be subject to large-scale implementation in school health services.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02279251 . Registered on 15 October 2014. Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index