LAIRD V. TATUM AND ARTICLE III STANDING IN SURVEILLANCE CASES.
| Autor: | Vagle, Jeffrey L. |
|---|---|
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law; Feb2016, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p1055-1066, 12p |
| Abstrakt: | The article examines consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in case 'Laird v. Tatum' in which the court address who could sue the government over a surveillance program and held that government surveillance did not constitute injury to meet Article III standing requirements. |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|