Autor: |
Ogawa, Koji, Kaminuma, Osamu, Kikkawa, Hideo, Kameda, Rieko, Ikezawa, Katsuo, Suko, Matsunobu, Okudaira, Hirokazu, Akiyama, Kazuo, Mori, Akio |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
International Archives of Allergy & Immunology; 1999 Supplement, Vol. 120, p15-18, 4p, 1 Chart, 1 Graph |
Abstrakt: |
Background: We have recently demonstrated that allergic eosinophilic inflammation is transferred to unprimed mice by infusing IL-5-producing CD4+ T cells. The contribution of mast cells to the development of eosinophilic inflammation is controversial. Methods: To clarify the possible different roles of CD4+ T cells and mast cells in eosinophilic inflammation, we compared antigen-induced airway eosinophilia between mast-cell-deficient mice (WBB6F1-W/W[sup v] ) and their congenic normal littermates (WBB6F1-+/+). Results: The time course study indicated that equivalent numbers of eosinophils were recruited into the airway of both +/+ and W/W[sup v] mice 6, 24, 96, and 216 h after antigen challenge, whereas the number of eosinophils 48 h after antigen challenge was significantly lower in W/W[sup v] compared to +/+ mice. Administration of either anti-CD4 or anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody almost completely inhibited antigen-induced eosinophil recruitment in W/W[sup v] mice 48 h after antigen challenge. In contrast, the inhibitory effect of these antibodies in +/+ mice were partial (∼50% inhibition). Anti-CD4 and anti-IL-5 antibodies equally suppressed airway eosinophilia in both +/+ and W/W[sup v] mice 96 h after antigen challenge. Conclusion: Our study indicates that CD4+ T cells are crucially involved in the development of allergic eosinophilic inflammation, while mast cells may play a supplemental role depending on the kinetics of the response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|