| Autor: |
Carlos, C., Hageman, J., Pellerite, M., McEntire, B., Côté, A., Raoux, A., Franco, P., Rusciolelli, C., Consenstein, L., Kelly, D. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine; 2015, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p307-311, 5p, 4 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: |
OBJECTIVE: Compare how NICUs within academic centers in Canada, France, and the United States make discharge decisions regarding cardiorespiratory recordings and home use of apnea monitors, oximeters and caffeine. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous survey was sent to neonatologists through the member listserv of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Perinatal Pediatrics, the Canadian Fellowship Program Directory, and to Level 3 NICUs in France. RESULTS: The response rates were 89%, 83%, and 79% for US, Canada and France respectively. In Canada, 45% perform pre-discharge recordings vs. 38% in France and 24% in the US. Apnea free days prior to discharge were required in 100% of centers in Canada, 96% in France, and 92% in the US. In Canada and France, 65% and 68% of units discharge patients on monitors vs. 99% in the US. 64% of the US centers sometimes use home caffeine compared to 40% in Canada and 34% in France. Over 60% of the centers in Canada and France wait until at least 40 weeks post menstrual age to discharge patients, whereas only about 33% of the US wait that late to discharge patients. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge practices from NICUs are not well standardized across institutions or countries. Canada and France keep infants in the hospital longer and are less likely than the US to use home monitoring and home caffeine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
