Comparison of Everolimus- versus Sirolimus-eluting stents in the provisional Bifurcation stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound: mid-term results of the J-REVERSE registry.

Autor: Murasato, Yoshinobu, Kinoshita, Yoshihisa, Yamawaki, Masahiro, Shinke, Toshiro, Otake, Hiromasa, Takeda, Yoshihiro, Fujii, Kenichi, Yamada, Shin-ichiro, Shimada, Yoshihisa, Yamashita, Takehiro, Yumoto, Kazuhiko
Zdroj: Cardiovascular Intervention & Therapeutics; Jan2016, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p1-12, 12p
Abstrakt: This study aimed at comparing the mid-term clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting (EES) with sirolimus-eluting (SES) stents in the provisional bifurcation stenting guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We compared the clinical outcome up to 9-month follow-up results of the prospective J-REVERSE registry of 300 non-left main bifurcation lesions in 298 patients treated with EES ( n = 240) and SES ( n = 60). The SB dilation with the kissing balloon technique (KBT) was performed in 54 %. The patient and lesion characteristics of the groups were similar. The incidences of SB dissections, occlusions, stenting, and slow flow were similar. A greater luminal volume gain was achieved in the proximal MV after KBT compared in non-KBT treated lesions in the EES group (7.9 ± 2.4 versus 7.0 ± 2.0 mm/mm, p = 0.002), though not in the SES group. The SB diameter stenosis in the non-KBT treatment at 9 months was greater than the KBT in both groups. The incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was 5.0 % in the EES versus 8.3 % in the SES group ( p = 0.35), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, including TLR, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and death was 5.4 % in the EES versus 11.7 % in the SES group ( p = 0.15). IVUS-guided provisional stenting with EES achieved a greater luminal gain after than without KBT, and similar clinical outcomes as with SES up to 9-month follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: