Autor: |
Steffes, Michael W., Chavers, Blanche M., Molitch, Mark E., Cleary, Patricia A., Lachin, John M., Genuth, Saul, Nathan, David M. |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association; 10/22/2003, Vol. 290 Issue 16, p2159-2167, 9p, 2 Charts, 4 Graphs |
Abstrakt: |
Context: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated the benefits of intensive treatment of diabetes in reducing glycemic levels and slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The DCCT cohort has been examined annually for another 8 years as part of the follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. During the EDIC study, glycemic levels no longer differed substantially between the 2 original treatment groups. Objective: To determine the long-term effects of intensive vs conventional diabetes treatment during the DCCT on kidney function during the EDIC study. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational study begun in 1993 (following DCCT closeout) in 28 medical centers in the United States and Canada. Participants were 1349 (of 1375) EDIC volunteers who had kidney evaluation at years 7 or 8. Main Outcome Measures: Development of microalbuminuria, clinical-grade albuminuria, hypertension, or increase in serum creatinine level. Results: Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat analyses, comparing the 2 original DCCT treatment groups. New cases of microalbuminuria occurred during the EDIC study in 39 (6.8%) of the participants originally assigned to the intensive-treatment group vs 87 (15.8%) of those assigned to the conventional-treatment group, for a 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-73%) reduction in odds, adjusted for baseline values, compared with a 59% (95% CI, 36%-74%) reduction at the end of the DCCT (P<.001 for both comparisons). New cases of clinical albuminuria occurred in 9 (1.4%) of the participants in the original intensive-treatment group vs 59 (9.4%) of those in the original conventional-treatment group, representing an 84% reduction in odds (95% CI, 67%-92%), compared with a reduction of 57% (95% CI, -1% to +81%) at the end of the DCCT. Fewer cases of hypertension (prevalence at year 8, 29.9% vs 40.3%; P<.001) developed in the original intensive-treatment group. Significantly ... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|