| Autor: |
Handcock, R. N., Gobbett, D. L., González, L. A., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., McGavin, S. L. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Biogeosciences Discussions; 2015, Vol. 12 Issue 21, p18007-18051, 45p, 3 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram, 8 Charts, 2 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: |
Timely and accurate monitoring of pasture biomass and ground-cover is necessary in livestock production systems to ensure productive and sustainable management of forage for livestock. Interest in the use of proximal sensors for monitoring pasture status in grazing systems has increased, since such sensors can return data in near real-time, and have the potential to be deployed on large properties where remote sensing may not be suitable due to issues such as spatial scale or cloud cover. However, there are unresolved challenges in developing calibrations to convert raw sensor data to quantitative biophysical values, such as pasture biomass or vegetation ground-cover, to allow meaningful interpretation of sensor data by livestock producers. We assessed the use of multiple proximal sensors for monitoring tropical pastures with a pilot deployment of sensors at two sites on Lansdown Research Station near Townsville, Australia. Each site was monitored by a Skye SKR-four-band multi-spectral sensor (every 1 min), a digital camera (every 30 min), and a soil moisture sensor (every 1 min), each operated over 18 months. Raw data from each sensor were processed to calculate a number of multispectral vegetation indices. Visual observations of pasture characteristics, including above-ground standing biomass and ground cover, were made every 2 weeks. A methodology was developed to manage the sensor deployment and the quality control of the data collected. The data capture from the digital cameras was more reliable than the multi-spectral sensors, which had up to 63 % of data discarded after data cleaning and quality control. We found a strong relationship between sensor and pasture measurements during the wet season period of maximum pasture growth (January to April), especially when data from the multi-spectral sensors were combined with weather data. RatioNS34 (a simple band ratio between the near infrared (NIR) and lower shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands) and rainfall since 1 September explained 91 % of the variation in above-ground standing biomass (RSE = 593 kg DM ha-1, p < 0.01). RatioNS34 together with rainfall explained 95 % of the variation in the percentage of green vegetation observed in 2-dimensions (%Green2D) (RSE = 6 %, p < 0.01). The Green Leaf Algorithm index derived from the digital camera images and the rainfall accumulated since the 1 September explained 91 % of the variation in %Green2D (RSE = 9 %, p < 0.01, df = 20), but had a poor relationship with biomass. Although proximal sensors observe only a small area of the pasture, they deliver continual and timely pasture measurements to inform timely decision-making on-farm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
