| Autor: |
Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Fontana M, Dunipace AJ, Li Y, Fischer GM, Proskin HM, Stookey GK, González-Cabezas, C, Fontana, M, Dunipace, A J, Li, Y, Fischer, G M, Proskin, H M, Stookey, G K |
| Zdroj: |
Caries Research; Sep/Oct1998, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p385-392, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
Tooth minerals are lost and regained constantly in a normal, human oral environment. Different methods have been developed to measure this gain and loss in enamel minerals; however, these methods deal with different problems, such as being time consuming or involving the use of X-rays. The aim of this study was to determine if remineralization measured in a thin enamel section (TS) by transversal microradiography (MR) can be reliably monitored by measuring lesion parameters (area, total and average dye fluorescence) on the same TS or on half a tooth (HT) with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Thirty-six human enamel specimens were demineralized for 96h, and then half of each specimen was covered with an acid-resistant nail varnish. Specimens were divided into three groups (12/group) and subjected for 20 days to a cyclic remineralization regimen with consisted daily of a 4-hour acid challenge, four 1-min treatment periods with 0, 250 or 1,100 ppm F dentifrice slurries (1:2; dentifrice:water) and 20 h in pooled, human saliva, at room temperature. Specimens were cut and analyzed by MR, then stained with a fluorescent dye (0.1mM rhodamine B) for 1 h and analyzed using CLSM. Both MR and CLSM detected significantly greater remineralization (p<0.05) in the specimens treated with the fluoride-containing dentifrices than in the specimens treated with 0 ppm F. Significant differences were detected between specimens treated witht the fluoride-containing dentifrices by MR and CLSM (HT area and total fluorescence). Statistically significant (p<0.05) Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the MR and CLSM data: difference in MR mineral content (DeltaM) versus HT lesion area = 0.71; DeltaM versus HT total fluorescence = 0.70; DeltaM versus HT average fluorescence = 0.61; DeltaM versus TS lesion area = 0.88; DeltaM versus TS total fluorescence = 0.63, and DeltaM versus TS average fluorescence = 0.40. It is concluded that confocal microscopy in either TS or HT may provide valid surrogates (area and total fluorescence) for MR measurements in enamel remineralization studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
