| Autor: |
Hamilton, Zachary, Neuilly, Melanie-Angela, Lee, Stephen, Barnoski, Robert |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Experimental Criminology; Jun2015, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p299-318, 20p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives: Recent evolutions in actuarial research have revealed the potential increased utility of machine learning and data-mining strategies to develop statistical models such as classification/decision-tree analysis and neural networks, which are said to mimic the decision-making of practitioners. The current article compares such actuarial modeling methods with a traditional logistic regression risk-assessment development approach. Methods: Utilizing a large purposive sample of Washington State offenders ( N = 297,600), the current study examines and compares the predictive validity of the currently used Washington State Static Risk Assessment (SRA) instrument to classification tree analysis/random forest and neural network models. Results: Overall findings varied, being dependent on the outcome of interest, with the best model for each method resulting in AUCs ranging from 0.732 to 0.762. Findings reveal some predictive performance improvements with advanced machine-learning methodologies, yet the logistic regression models demonstrate comparable predictive performance. Conclusions: The study concluded that while data-mining techniques hold potential for improvements over traditional methods, regression-based models demonstrate comparable, and often improved, prediction performance with noted parsimony and greater interpretability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink