A double-blind double-dummy study of citalopram comparing infusion versus oral administration.
Autor: | Baumann P; Unité de Biochimie et Psychopharmacologie Clinique, Département Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, Site de Cery, Prilly-Lausanne, Switzerland., Nil R, Bertschy G, Jecker A, Brändli H, Morand J, Kasas A, Vuagniaux O, Ramseier F |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of affective disorders [J Affect Disord] 1998 Jun; Vol. 49 (3), pp. 203-10. |
DOI: | 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00024-x |
Abstrakt: | Background: This study compares antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of citalopram given either orally or as a slow drop infusion. Methods: Citalopram (40 mg/day) was administered double-blindly as tablets or slow-drop infusion during the first 10 days and then open, orally, up to treatment Day 42. Results: In 60 moderately to severely depressed patients, the Hamilton depression total score (17-items) at baseline was 23.9 and 23.6 in the active infusion (n = 30) and active tablet (n = 30) group, respectively. These scores dropped in both groups to 15.6 and 16.9 on Day 10, and to 10.3 and 10.2 on Day 42. Response rates (delta Hamilton > or = 50%) amounted to 33.3% and 17.9% on Day 10, and 66.2% and 63.3% on Day 42, without a relevant group difference in citalopram plasma concentration. Conclusion: Slow-drop infusion with citalopram shows a similar risk/benefit relationship to oral citalopram. The design of this study allowed us to evaluate pharmacological but not psychological factors which may contribute to response to slow-drop infusion. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |