[Efficacy and complications of intraprostatic prosthesis in the treatment of benign hyperplasia of the prostate].

Autor: Clemente Ramos L; Departamento de Cirugía y Ciencias Morfológicas, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España., Burgos Revilla FJ, Fernández Fernández E, Jiménez Cidre M, Cruz Guerra N, Escudero Barrilero A
Jazyk: Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj: Archivos espanoles de urologia [Arch Esp Urol] 1997 Sep; Vol. 50 (7), pp. 773-80.
Abstrakt: Objective: The UroLume stent has been utilized in the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), particularly in patients at high surgical risk. Our results are analyzed and the literature reviewed.
Methods: From June, 1994 to November, 1996, 19 patients at high surgical risk (ASA III/IV) with symptomatic BPH were treated at our center; 17 (89.4%) had an indwelling catheter. The UroLume stent was inserted under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation.
Results: Stent placement as monotherapy was found to be clinically effective in 15 patients (78.9%) with a mean follow-up of 8.2 +/- 5.7 months (range 1-18). The mean symptom score (Madsen-Iversen) was 6.1 +/- 1.2. Patients with no further manipulations had a mean maximum flow rate of 8.8 +/- 3.8 ml/s. Two patients (10.5%) required stent removal due to retrograde displacement in one case and perineal discomfort and irritative voiding symptoms in the other. In two other patients (10.5%), remnant tissue had to be resected in order to void spontaneously. Seventeen patients (89.4%) were satisfied with the results. No case of urosepsis or incrustations were documented. A microbiological analysis disclosed urinary tract infection in one patient.
Conclusions: The UroLume stent is clinically effective in the treatment of symptomatic BPH in patients unfit for prostatic surgery. It carries a low incidence of major complications and procedure-related morbidity.
Databáze: MEDLINE