Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of adapalene gel and tretinoin gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: Europe and U.S. multicenter trials.
Autor: | Cunliffe WJ; General Infirmary, Leeds., Caputo R, Dreno B, Förström L, Heenen M, Orfanos CE, Privat Y, Robledo Aguilar A, Meynadier J, Alirezai M, Jablonska S, Shalita A, Weiss JS, Chalker DK, Ellis CN, Greenspan A, Katz HI, Kantor I, Millikan LE, Swinehart JM, Swinyer L, Whitmore C, Czernielewski J, Verschoore M |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [J Am Acad Dermatol] 1997 Jun; Vol. 36 (6 Pt 2), pp. S126-34. |
DOI: | 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70056-2 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Adapalene is a new chemical entity that exhibits tretinoin-like activities in the terminal differentiation process. Objective: We evaluated a dose range effect of two concentrations of adapalene gel as acne treatment and compared adapalene 0.1% gel with tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of acne patients in two large multicenter studies. Methods: Multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel group studies including 89 acne patients in the dose range study and 591 patients in the concurrent controlled studies were conducted. Results: Adapalene gel 0.1% was significantly more effective in treating acne lesions than 0.03% adapalene gel. Adapalene gel 0.1% was significantly more effective than 0.025% or tretinoin gel in one study and of the same effectiveness in the other study. Adapalene gel was always better tolerated than tretinoin gel. Conclusion: Adapalene 0.1% gel is a safe and effective treatment of acne vulgaris. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |