Preserved antioxidative defense of lipoproteins in renal failure and during hemodialysis.

Autor: Schulz T; Institut für Prophylaxe und Epidemiologie der Kreislaufkrankheiten, bd Universität München, Germany., Schiffl H, Scheithe R, Hrboticky N, Lorenz R
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation [Am J Kidney Dis] 1995 Apr; Vol. 25 (4), pp. 564-71.
DOI: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90124-8
Abstrakt: Contact to artificial surfaces during hemodialysis activates leukocytes, which then form oxidized arachidonic acid products and free radicals. This might promote the oxidative modification of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) that play a key role in the initiation of atherosclerosis. Thus, leukocyte activation could specifically contribute to the high mortality from atherosclerotic complications on long-term hemodialysis. Therefore monitored LDL and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) resistance to copper-stimulated oxidation in patients with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis with cellulose acetate or polysulfone membranes (n = 12), in patients with chronic renal failure (n = 13) and in healthy controls (n = 12). Six of the dialysis patients were restudied during a single cuprophane dialysis. Circulating leukocytes were reversibly reduced early in hemodialysis with cellulose acetate (minimum, 83.6% +/- 7.4% of baseline values at 30 minutes after dialysis start), polysulfone (minimum, 80.4% +/- 10.5% at 15 minutes; P < 0.05) and cuprophane (minimum, 24.5% +/- 8.5% at 60 minutes; P < 0.0001). Despite the leukocyte activation, LDL oxidation lag time was not shortened in comparison with healthy controls and was even prolonged at the end of cellulose acetate (P < 0.05) and cuprophane (P < 0.05) dialysis. HDL oxidation lag time increased (12.6% +/- 0.9%; P < 0.0001) 15 to 60 minutes after start of hemodialysis and returned to predialysis values thereafter. In patients with chronic renal failure, the lag time of HDL oxidation was significantly prolonged (13.34 minutes +/- 0.9) compared with healthy controls (10.91 +/- 2.0 minutes; P < 0.01) as well as compared with the dialysis patients at baseline (9.9 minutes +/- 1.4; P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Databáze: MEDLINE