| Autor: |
Ingham RJ; University of California, Santa Barbara, USA., Cordes AK, Ingham JC, Gow ML |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of speech and hearing research [J Speech Hear Res] 1995 Apr; Vol. 38 (2), pp. 315-26. |
| DOI: |
10.1044/jshr.3802.315 |
| Abstrakt: |
This study was designed to investigate the apparent contradiction between recent reports of physiological and interpersonal research on stuttering that claim or imply high agreement levels, and studies of stuttering judgment agreement itself that report much lower agreement levels. Four experienced stuttering researchers in one university department used laser videodisks of spontaneous speech, from persons whose stuttering could be described as mild to severe, to locate the precise onset and offset of individual stuttering events. Results showed a series of interjudge disagreements that raise serious questions about the reliability and validity of stuttering event onset and offset judgments. These results highlight the potentially poor reliability of a measurement procedure that is currently widespread in stuttering research. At the same time, they have isolated some few highly agreed stuttering events that might serve as the basis for the further development of either event-based or interval-based judgment procedures. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
