| Autor: |
Reading AE; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, Calif. 90024 U.S.A. Biometrics Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AD, Great Britain Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AD Great Britain., Hand DJ, Sledmere CM |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Pain [Pain] 1983 Aug; Vol. 16 (4), pp. 375-383. |
| DOI: |
10.1016/0304-3959(83)90151-3 |
| Abstrakt: |
The response profiles on the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) were compared with those obtained from a checklist format, consisting of the 78 MPQ words arranged in random order. Both forms were administered to 3 patient groups: (a) primiparae experiencing post-episiotomy pain (n = 60); (b) outpatients attending a rheumatology clinic wisdom tooth extraction (n = 60); and (c) inpatients having undergone wisdom tooth extraction (n = 60). The order of administration was balanced, so that within each patient group 40 patients received either one of the study forms and 20 both, yielding total sample sizes of 120 and 60 for further statistical analyses. Comparison of numbers of words checked in the two formats showed considerable similarity and so for purposes of further comparison, the MPQ structure was imposed on the checklist. This permitted comparison of summary scores, with no significant differences in mean level, with the sole exception of the evaluative subscale. Comparison of individual subgroup profiles on both forms also showed considerable similarity. A second objective was to compare the format in discriminating between patient groups. It was found that the MPQ offered a higher correct classification rate, although there was little in it, with MPQ subgroup scores rather than subscale scores showing marginally better results. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
