Medical research council trial of antilymphocyte globulin in renal transplantation. A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical investigation.

Autor: Bell PR, Blamey RW, Briggs JD, Castro JE, Hamilton DN, Knapp MS, Salaman JR, Sells RA, Williams G, Gowans JL, Peto R, Richards S, Phillips AW, Weinberg AL, Freestone DS
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Transplantation [Transplantation] 1983 Jun; Vol. 35 (6), pp. 539-45.
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198306000-00005
Abstrakt: A total of 173 patients who received live donor or cadaveric primary or secondary renal transplants at five British hospitals were entered into a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial of equine antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) administered prophylactically to prevent rejection. The ALG was prepared in the early 1970s and used cultured human lymphoblasts as antigen. Following transplantation all patients were treated with a standard immunosuppressant regimen of steroids and azathioprine and, in addition, were given either 30 mg/kg ALG or placebo daily for 10 days by intravenous infusion. In comparison with more recently produced materials, the ALG employed in this study was of moderate potency in prolonging skin graft survival in monkeys. Primary graft failure occurred in 27 patients (15/86 ALG and 12/87 placebo). At three to five years after transplantation 50 of the remaining patients had died, almost all from diseases relating to their renal condition, and 25 more had suffered complete graft failure. No significant differences were found between patients treated with ALG and placebo in the numbers with functioning grafts during the 3 years following transplantation, in the time between transplantation and the first rejection episode, or in the number of episodes during the first six months after transplantation. This applied whether live or cadaveric grafts were employed. Within the first 6 months of operation, infection was given as a major contributory cause of death in 12 patients treated with ALG and in 5 who received placebo (P greater than 0.1). Infections were also slightly more common during the two weeks following transplantation in those receiving ALG (13/86 ALG, 10/87 placebo). As expected, graft survival was significantly better in patients who received live donor grafts (P = 0.001) and in patients with the least donor-recipient histocompatibility mismatches (P = 0.008). The results of this multicenter trial show no therapeutic benefit to renal graft recipients from the administration of ALG, and suggest that the risks of fatal infection may have been aggravated. Use of such equine ALG in similar dose regimens is therefore, not, justified in renal transplantation, especially if some part of the apparent effects on fatal infections is real. It is stressed that these findings are relevant only to the equine ALG used in this study, which was raised with cultured human lymphoblasts as the antigen, and to ALG prepared in a similar way and of similar potency. It should not be inferred that these results are applicable to ALG prepared in other ways.
Databáze: MEDLINE