| Abstrakt: |
To determine whether hydrogen magnetic resonance imaging at 0.7 T provides added clinical value over imaging at 0.35 T, images of the heads of patients with various intracranial disorders were obtained at these field strengths. Measurements of tissue contrast (C), signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, and T1 and T2 relaxation times were determined. For a given spin-echo sequence with equal imaging time, resolution, and data sampling window, the product C X S/N was somewhat lower for the lower field strength. Under conditions of imaging with equal chemical shift artifact, C X S/N at 0.35 T was equal to or greater than that measured at 0.7 T. With an increase in field strength, T1 of pathologic areas and surrounding normal tissues increased, resulting in a corresponding loss of absolute signal level and decrease in contrast. Lesions were equally well seen at both 0.35 T and 0.7 T. The increased T1 and decreased C X S/N for higher magnetic fields--when measured with a fixed imaging time, resolution, chemical shift, and sequence--suggest that such field strengths may not improve tissue contrast, diagnostic ability, or clinical throughput when compared with lower field strength systems. |
