Initial Validation of the Mandarin Translation of the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale (SSDS).

Autor: Ge J; Xiaoshan District Special Education School of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, China., Su X; Faculty of Education, Department of Early Childhood Education, China Research Institute of Care and Education of Infants and Young Children, East China Normal University, Zhongshan North Street, No.3663, Shanghai, 200062, China. xysu@spe.ecnu.edu.cn., Uljarević M; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA., Cai RY; Aspect Research Centre for Autism Practice, Autism Spectrum Australia, Level 5, Tower B, The Zenith, 821 Pacific Highway, Chatswood, NSW, 2067, Australia.; School of Psychology and Public Health, Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of autism and developmental disorders [J Autism Dev Disord] 2024 Dec 23. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 23.
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06684-w
Abstrakt: This study aimed to validate the Mandarin translation of the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale (SSDS). The initial validation sample consisted of 480 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (M age  = 9.35). Discriminant validity was appraised by comparing relevant SSDS scores among samples of children with ASD, typical development (TD) (N = 160, M age  = 7.16), and non-ASD but Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs) (N = 170, M age  = 5.08). Confirmatory application of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling indicated that a five-factor model encompassing Social Motivation (SM), Social Affiliation (SA), Expressive Social Communication (ESC), Social Recognition (SR) and Unusual Approach (UA) provided adequate to excellent fit to the data in ASD group ([CFI] = .908, [TLI] = .930, [RMSEA] = .052, [SRMR] = .028). The factor loadings of most items constituting SM, SA, ESC, and SR factors were aligned with the original factor structure in the US sample, except items on the UA factor that showed lower loadings. The internal consistency was .93-.96, and test-retest reliability was .86. Discriminate validity was excellent, with the ASD group showing significantly lower scores compared to non-ASD NDDs and TD groups. Convergent and divergent validity of the SSDS was strong, as indexed by the pattern of correlations with relevant Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition (SRS-2), and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) domains. This study provided preliminary validation of the Mandarin translation of the SSDS by largely replicating the original factor structure and showing evidence for strong discriminant, convergent, and divergent validity. Potential areas where further refinement and potential expansion of the SSDS are needed were identified.
Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interests: All authors disclosed no relevant relations. Mirko Uljarević is an AE for JADD but was not involved in the editorial process for this article. Ethical Approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of East China Normal University (Ethics Approval ID: HR 510–2020). Consent to Participate: Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: