Deucravacitinib shows superior efficacy and safety in cutaneous lupus erythematosus compared to various biologics and small molecules - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor: Bokor LA; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Martyin K; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Krebs M; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Galajda NÁ; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Meznerics FA; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Szabó B; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Hegyi P; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, 25-29 Tömő Street, Budapest 1083, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 12 Szigeti Street, Pécs 7624, Hungary., Lőrincz K; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Kiss N; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Bánvölgyi A; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary., Hidvégi B; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 41 Mária Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 22 Baross Street, Budapest 1085, Hungary. Electronic address: hidvegi.bernadett@semmelweis.hu.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Autoimmunity reviews [Autoimmun Rev] 2024 Dec 16; Vol. 24 (3), pp. 103723. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 16.
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103723
Abstrakt: Background: Novel therapies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) demonstrated efficacy and safety in previous trials. However, data on the comparison of these treatments is still lacking, limiting their integration into clinical practice. Therefore, our aim is to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of novel systemic therapies in CLE.
Methods: A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL on November 25, 2023, to identify studies involving patients with CLE or SLE with active skin involvement treated with novel systemic therapies. The primary outcomes assessed were the proportion of patients achieving the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-50 (CLASI-50), the change in CLASI-A, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs).
Results: 18,280 records were retrieved, of which 53 met the inclusion criteria. Deucravacitinib showed significantly greater efficacy in achieving the CLASI50 compared to placebo (OR: 8.28, 95 % CI: 2.22-30.91). Both litifilimab (OR: 2.54, 95 % CI: 1.20-5.40) and anifrolumab (OR: 2.25, 95 % CI: 1.23-4.14) were also significantly more effective than placebo. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of AEs and SAEs between these therapeutics and placebo.
Conclusion: Anifrolumab and litifilimab are effective and safe treatment options in CLE. However, deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy and safety with fewer adverse events compared to anifrolumab. CLE patients who have shown an inadequate response to first- and second-line treatments may benefit from the incorporation of deucravacitinib into their treatment regimens.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: