High-power versus low-power laser settings during endoscopic stone disease management: a systematic review from the EAU endourology section.

Autor: Spinos T; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece., Somani BK; European Association of Urology Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.; Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK., Tatanis V; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece., Skolarikos A; European Association of Urology Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.; Second Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital, 15126, Athens, Greece., Tokas T; European Association of Urology Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.; Department of Urology, Medical School, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece., Knoll T; European Association of Urology Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.; University Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany., Peteinaris A; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece., Vagionis A; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece., Liatsikos E; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece.; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria., Kallidonis P; Department of Urology, University of Patras Hospital, 26504, Patras, Greece. pkallidonis@yahoo.com.; European Association of Urology Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands. pkallidonis@yahoo.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: World journal of urology [World J Urol] 2024 Dec 16; Vol. 43 (1), pp. 34. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 16.
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05408-0
Abstrakt: Purpose: Optimal laser settings during endoscopic stone disease management still represents a debatable issue. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize all existing evidence regarding the comparison of high-power (HP) versus low-power (LP) laser settings during different endoscopic lithotripsy procedures.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically screened, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. All endoscopic laser lithotripsy surgical approaches were included, including ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and transurethral lithotripsy for bladder stones. Pediatric patients were also included.
Results: In total, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. In most studies total operative time (OT) was shorter for the HP group. Mean fragmentation time was homogenously significantly shorter in the HP group. Stone-free rates (SFR) ranged from 59.0% to 100% for the LP group and from 78.9% to 100% for the HP group. Total complication rates were higher for the LP group in six studies, equivalent between the two groups in one study and higher in the HP group in one study.
Conclusion: HP laser lithotripsy is a safe and efficient approach for URS, RIRS, PCNL and cystolithotripsy. HP laser settings were associated with significantly shorter total operative time, while some studies reported also better SFR in the HP groups. The implementation of more Randomized Controlled Trials comparing HP and LP laser lithotripsy in different stone settings is of outmost importance, so that better conclusions can be drawn.
Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: