Validity evidence for a French version of the Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D).

Autor:	Bajwa NM; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: nadia.bajwa@hcuge.ch., Favre S; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Perneger T; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Dao MD; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Audetat MC; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Nendaz MR; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Perron NJ; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland., Richard-Lepouriel H; Département de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Geneva University Hospital, rue Willy-Donzé, 6, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	L'Encephale [Encephale] 2024 Dec 13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 13.
DOI:	10.1016/j.encep.2024.10.002
Abstrakt:	Objectives: Physicians demonstrate low rates of help seeking for psychiatric disorders, occupational stress, and burnout due to perceived stigma. The Stigma of Occupational Stress Scale for Doctors (SOSS-D) is a brief standardized tool designed to measure stigma (personal, perceived other, and perceived structural) in physicians. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for a French version of the SOSS-D. Methods: The SOSS-D was translated into French and piloted with 12 physicians. The scale was administered to physicians at the Geneva University Hospitals. We computed descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients. Construct validity was analyzed using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor (CFA) analyses. Results: In total, 323 physicians participated in the survey. The internal consistency coefficient for the French SOSS-D was 0.72, 0.55 for the personal stigma subscale, 0.66 for the perceived other stigma subscale, and 0.65 for the perceived structural stigma subscale. CFA indicated a marginal fit. EFA revealed three factors: personal, perceived other, and perceived structural stigma. Discussion: Our findings support the hypothesis that stigma is a multi-dimensional construct. However, the French version of the SOSS-D scale did demonstrate some differences when compared to its English version. Identifying stigmatization beliefs among physicians may allow for increased identification of physicians at risk, and increased communication concerning preventive actions. Moreover, being aware of and fighting stigma can reduce barriers to help seeking and increased access to care resources for burnt-out physicians. Conclusion: The results provide evidence of the validity and reliability of the French version of the SOSS-D indicating its suitability for use in a French-speaking physician population. (Copyright © 2024 L'Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu