Gain of Protection Afforded by the Methoxypropylamino Cyclohexenylidene Ethoxyethylcyanoacetate (MCE) UVA1 Filter on Pigmentary and Aging Signs: An Outdoor 4-Week Randomized, Intra-Individual Comparative Study in 52 Brazilian Women.

Autor: Mercurio DG; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Flament F; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Clichy, France., Muller B; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Clichy, France., Bernerd F; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France., Josso M; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Chevilly-Larue, France., Jager-Lezer N; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Chevilly-Larue, France., Delaunay C; L'Oréal Research and Innovation, Chevilly-Larue, France., Passeron T; Department of Dermatology, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU Nice, Nice, France.; INSERM, U1065, C3M, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine [Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed] 2025 Jan; Vol. 41 (1), pp. e13020.
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.13020
Abstrakt: Background: Conventional sunscreens shield the skin from ultraviolet (UV) rays up to 370 nm leaving wavelengths between 370 and 400 nm unfiltered despite their potentially harmful biological and clinical effects.
Objective: The beneficial effects of methoxypropylamino cyclohexenylidene ethoxyethylcyanoacetate (MCE) UVA1 filter were explored at 1% in a SPF50 sunscreen under outdoors summer conditions against pigmentation and aging signs compared against a reference SPF50 without the MCE filter.
Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized comparative intra-individual study was conducted in 52 Brazilian women (phototype I-III). A hemiface application was performed for the SPF50 sunscreen with 1% MCE and SPF50 reference without MCE before 1-h outdoor sunlight exposure, twice daily for 4 weeks. Study endpoint included expert panel grading of pigmentation (3), vascular (1) signs as well as facial skin ageing and assessment of facial skin radiance and skin homogeneity by a naïve panel.
Results: Significant differences were reported for all facial signs comparing areas protected with SPF50/MCE and SPF50, respectively: upper lip wrinkles, crow's feet wrinkles, upper lip texture, upper lip pigmentation, vascular abnormalities (all p < 0.0001), texture of the mouth contour (p = 0.001), ptosis of lower face (p = 0.003), lateral facial pigmentation (p = 0.005), and whole face pigmentation (p = 0.01). The evaluations performed by naïve panel showed a significant superiority of the SPF50/MCE product for skin homogeneity (p = 0.043).
Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrates a significant gain of protection with the SPF50 containing 1% MCE in reducing hyperpigmentation, redness and aging signs compared to the same SPF50 sunscreen without MCE, thus supporting the need for an enlarged UVA1 photoprotection.
(© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE