Piloting Market Food Environment Assessments in LMICs: A Feasibility Assessment and Lessons Learned.

Autor:	Downs S; Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA., Warne T; Center for American Indian and Rural Health Equity, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA., McClung S; USAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, VA, USA., Vogliano C; USAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, VA, USA., Alexander N; USAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, VA, USA., Kennedy G; USAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, VA, USA., Ahmed S; Center for American Indian and Rural Health Equity, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA., Crum J; USAID Advancing Nutrition, Arlington, VA, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Food and nutrition bulletin [Food Nutr Bull] 2024 Dec; Vol. 45 (4), pp. 125-141.
DOI:	10.1177/03795721241296185
Abstrakt:	Background: Food environments are rapidly changing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), leading to dietary shifts. Many gaps exist in the measurement of food environments in LMICs making it difficult to characterize the linkages between food environments and diets. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of implementing USAID Advancing Nutrition's Market Food Environment Assessment (MFEA)-a suite of 7 non-resource intensive food environment assessments. Methods: We implemented the MFEA package in 4 countries (Liberia, Honduras, Nigeria, and Timor-Leste) and assessed the feasibility of implementing the package by conducting a descriptive analysis, using both qualitative and quantitative data of enumerators' feedback collected through training evaluations, feedback forms, detailed notes from meetings, and final reports from in-country partners. Results: Overall, we found it feasible to implement the MFEA, some assessments being easier to implement and more practical than others. Several key themes related to the MFEA implementation were identified across the countries, including: the potential for vendors to be hesitant to engage in assessments; the importance of ascertaining buy-in from local officials; the need to shift toward electronic, rather than paper-based, data collection; difficulties in selecting markets; the time constraints of conducting some of the assessments; and the need for better alignment between the instructions, data collection, and data analysis sheets. Conclusions: The package of food environment assessments, with minimal additional refinement, can be used to characterize market food environments in LMIC settings to inform context-specific interventions. Testing the feasibility of implementing a package of 7 assessments to measure factors influencing food access in low-resource settings. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu