Distinguishing subclinical from clinical keratoconus by corneal measurements.
| Autor: | Nicula CA; Department of Oral-Maxilo-Facial Surgery, 'Iuliu Hațieganu' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.; Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania., Horvath KU; Department of Ophthalmology, Medicine and Pharmacy Science and Technology University, 'George Emil Palade', Târgu Mureș, Romania.; Department of Ophthalmology, Emergency County Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania., Nicula AP; Department of Ophthalmology, Emergency County Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania., Bulboacă AE; Department of Pathophysiology, 'Iuliu Haţieganu' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania., Bolboacă SD; Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, 'Iuliu Haţieganu' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania., Nicula D; Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Frontiers in medicine [Front Med (Lausanne)] 2024 Nov 14; Vol. 11, pp. 1427666. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 14 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmed.2024.1427666 |
| Abstrakt: | Purpose: The study aimed to determine the stability of topographic and tomographic indices measured with Pentacam and to evaluate the biomechanical parameters measured with Corvis ST in the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus (sKCN) and clinical keratoconus (KCN). Methods: This is a single-center cohort study with a retrospective review of topographic and tomographic indices and biomechanical parameters on adult patients with subclinical keratoconus (sKCN), clinical keratoconus (KCN), and healthy subjects (control group). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to identify the cutoff values for evaluated indices able to distinguish between subjects with sKCN and those with KCN. Results: Seventy-six patients (76 eyes) in the sKCN group, 74 patients (132 eyes) in the KCN group, and 70 patients (140 eyes) in the control group were analyzed. Evaluated participants had similar age, but in the sKCN group, men were predominant ( p = 0.0070). Significantly higher values in the KCN group of Front Kmax, ISV, IVA, KI, IHD, BAD_D, and lower values of TL and PRC (with excellent accuracy AUC > 0.9) were observed in the differentiation of KCN by controls. Similarly, excellent accuracies were obtained by Front Kmax, ISV, IVA, KI, IHD, KISA, I-S, BAD_D, and RMS-total with higher values in the KCN group and PRC and ARTmax with lower values in patients with KCN as compared to those with sKCN. Only Front Kmean (AUC = 0.946, Se = 85.6%, Sp = 90.4%, p < 0.0001) and I-S Pentacam (AUC = 0.96, Se = 84.1%, Sp = 97.3%, p < 0.0001) proved accurate and not shared with differentiation of sKCN or KCN by normal eyes. Front Kmean Pentacam proved good for case findings (0.806 [0.742 to 0.871]) and screening (0.712 [0.645 to 0.778]). I-S Pentacam performed excellent for case findings (0.826 [0.764 to 0.888]) and good for screening (0.758 [0.700 to 0.817]). Conclusion: Subclinical and clinical KCN shared common Pentacam parameters with excellent or good accuracy in distinguishing subjects with and without pathology, but Front Kmean and I-S Pentacam proved excellent or good for case finding and screening and are not shared with differentiation of the sKCN or KCN by the normal eyes. Furthermore, differentiation of sKCN by normal eyes could be done with KISA (Pentacam) and CBI (Corvis) parameters, but only CBI is not shared with KCN. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Nicula, Horvath, Nicula, Bulboacă, Bolboacă and Nicula.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|